Wednesday, 11 April 2018

WW111 another Colonial Resource War. Culling The Plebs Malthusian Psychopathy Misanthropic Catastrophists








Authentic Discourses on Decisions to Act.

A golden Rule in folklores Canon
holds what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the Gander
do unto others that which to you would be done
thus applied in discussion, we should always avoid slander.

Leave at the first introduction
the habits of Authority and induction
When those listening seem deaf to what you tell
refrain if you please from poisoning the well

if your working hypothesis requires certitude
refrain from tailoring cloth that renders the emperor nude
If to your point, you wish others to allude
refrain from a hypocritical sneering attitude.

When your correspondent appeals to evidence
consider their sources, were they well meant?
In all matters, skepticism will serve you with equivalence
and always remember to mistrust the Government.


I noticed this exchange in the off guardian discussion about the #DumberandDouma false Flag attempted half baked Casus Belli.
What is the direction of travel and main narrative embedded in the Narrative of the past 40 years. The Rules Based International Order or ( New Workld Order ) Narratives.

1. Globalisation and Urbbanisation.
2.Petro Dollar Hegenomy . Addiction to Oil.
3. Man Made Global Warming
4. Overshoot Over population
5. Elitism, Starfucking worship of ''The Elites**





  • Francis Lee
    ”The world is vastly overpopulated and population needs to be reduced by 90%” Methinks you’ve been reading too much Thomas Malthus my friend. Actually Europe’s population is in decline with a falling birth rate and in the case of Eastern Europe a rising death rate. Also there is no necessary correlation between population density and wealth. Mongolia is a country the size of western Europe but with a population the size of Birmingham in the UK. The over populated London and the south east of England has a higher standard of living than the rest of the UK particularly under populated Scotland and Wales. Russia’s population is stable at best and there are huge areas in Siberia which are virtually uninhabited. And on and on.
    Like
    4
    0

    Rate This
    • Methinks you’ve been reading too much Thomas Malthus my friend. Actually Europe’s population is in decline with a falling birth rate and in the case of Eastern Europe a rising death rate
      Methinks whoever your math and science teachers were in school should have been fired for letting you past the 8th grade, because they betrayed their mission as educators. So appalling is your mathematical and scientific illiteracy.
      Question: if a place that is several times over carrying capacity is decreasing its population by some very small percentage, what does that make it?
      Answer: a place that is still deeply in overshoot.
      Another question: if one region of the world is slightly decreasing its population, but the world as a whole is on a steady trajectory upwards, how relevant to the overall picture is the small decrease in that one particular region?
      How difficult are these simple concept to grasp?
      Given peak oil, climate change, aquifer depletion, soil degradation, deforestation, the ongoing mass extinction, and all the other ways that the fact that we are already deep deep into overshoot is manifesting itself, one has to be a complete lunatic to think “Oh, but Europe’s population is declining a bit so everything is OK”.
      Like
      1
      3

      Rate This
      • Mikalina
        I think you should go sit on the naughty step until you have learnt some manners.
        Like
        2
        0

        Rate This
      • Extreme carrying capacity estimates go far outside the broad, fourfold range bracketed by the estimates just cited. They have been defined by true believers in the antipodal camps of catastrophist and cornucopian futures. A generation ago Ehrlich (1968) wrote that “the battle to feed all humanity is over” and that “hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death” during the 1970s.2 Ehrlich’s global population maximum would have to be well below the 1970 total of about 3.7 billion people. In contrast, Simon (1981) maintained that food has no long-run, physi-cal limit. These extremes leave us either with the prospect of eliminating about half of humanity in order to return the worldwide count to a sup-portable level or with visions of crop harvests surpassing the mass of the planet itself.3 As Sauvy (1990[1949]: 774) noted crisply, “Lack of precision in data and in method of analysis allows shortcuts toward reaching an ob-jective predetermined by prejudice, shaped largely either by faith in progress or by conservative skepticism.”

        Limits to Growth is now pretty much past its sell by date
        Criticism of LTG was immediate. Peter Passell and two co-authors published a 2 April 1972 article in the New York Times describing LTG as “…an empty and misleading work …. best summarized … as a rediscovery of the oldest maxim of computer science: Garbage In, Garbage Out.” Passell found the study’s simulations to be simplistic, while assigning little value to the role of technological progress in solving the problems of resource depletion, pollution, and food production. They charged that all LTG simulations ended in collapse, predicted the imminent end of irreplaceable resources, and, finally, that the entire endeavor was motivated by a hidden agenda: to halt growth in its tracks.[17]
        In 1973, a group of researchers at the Science Policy Research Unit at the University of Sussex, published Models of Doom; A Critique of The Limits to Growth. The Sussex group examined the structure and assumptions of the MIT models. They concluded that the simulations were very sensitive to a few key assumptions and suggest that the MIT assumptions were unduly pessimistic. The Sussex scientists concluded that the MIT methodology, data, and projections were faulty and do not accurately reflect reality.[18] Claiming that the Sussex critics applied “micro reasoning to macro problems”, the LTG team, in “A Response to Sussex”, described and analyzed five major areas of disagreement between themselves and the Sussex authors.[19]
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth
        One thing that puzzles me is why when draws the conclusion that the MSM is a lie machine, Which I agree with. Then why is it the Anthropogenic Global Warming due to the CO2 Hypothesis is somehow a Truth that the MSM is Consistently Telling? I can not reconcile that contradiction, I am curious how you do yourself?
        Addicted to Distracted By Bruce Charlton Makes for compelling if Uncomfortable reading.
        http://addictedtodistraction.blogspot.se/
        It will offend most readers but he has a very good point, I do not share his pessimism but the rest is hard to argue with.
        “People and events presented by the media as Good are always, in reality, bad; and people or events presented by the media as bad are usually (but not always) Good — and when bad people or events are not presented as Good, then they are condemned as bad for the wrong reasons.
        Also, if genuinely Good things happen to be presented as Good by the Mass Media; then it will invariably be the case that they also are said to be Good for the wrong reasons.
        Thus, the major output of the modern International Mass Media consists of only four categories:
        1. Good presented as bad
        2. Bad presented as Good
        (That is to say simple inversion)
        3. Good presented as Good for a bad reason
        4. Bad presented as bad for a bad reason
        (That is to say explanatory inversion)
        These four categories, which can be summarized as either simple or explanatory inversion, account for all sustained and high-impact modern major Mass Media stories without any exceptions.
        Therefore those who want to free their minds from the Mass Media must first avoid as much Mass Media output as possible, and secondly develop automatic negativistic behaviour towards the Mass Media output which they cannot avoid”.
        https://off-guardian.org/2017/06/17/the-revolution-is-being-televised-but-why/
        For what its worth here is my investigation of The Carbon Cycle, Climate Science and all of that.
        http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2016/11/climate-change-agw-and-all-points-from.html
        Climate Population and Green Fascist misanthropic Catastrophe Porn makes me think that Green are the new BrownShirts.
        Liked by you
        0
        0

        Rate This
        Your comment is awaiting moderation.



1234


Globalisation Un-Entangled. (A FOUND POEM, CIPHER OF GLOBALISM ) 

A TRILOGY IN FOUR PARTS.

USURY HELL´S FUEL MANS OPPRESSOR

BOURGOISE RESOLUTION AND 

GLOBALISATION UN ENTANGLED.




Show more reactio
 "Ages ago," Urthred continued, "we certainly used to speak
languages.



Globalisation Un-Entangled.


''The reader of Pope, as of every author, is advised to begin by letting him say what he has to say, in his own manner to an open mind that seeks only to receive the impressions which the writer wishes to convey. First let the mind and spirit of the writer come into free, full contact with the mind and spirit of the reader, whose attitude at the first reading should be simply receptive. Such reading is the condition precedent to all true judgment of a writer’s work. All criticism that is not so grounded spreads as fog over a poet’s page. Read, reader, for yourself, without once pausing to remember what you have been told to think´´.
Henry Morley.


the idea before it was clothed in words
heard in minds, as uttered thought
the communication of arranged ideas
Thoughts lifting mist from the poet´s page.

To set the stage, not in the round
but, to see the scene in the sphere
Which actors will the playwright lay
on the page´s narrative to steer.

Which course to meet
who to set upon the bridge
For strength of Bulls Wall Street
of Bears & onion domes upon our chart

A heroes pride found in Britannia's isles
Monks ´´sans humilite´´ fane ease
Like Pope we find our actors
´´All, all alike, find reason on their side´´


mais par impatience de souffrir
On the present discontents, Burke opined
Putin ,Trump and Farage set courses un-entangled
Junker , Merkel, Call for straight ahead.


Few are the partisans of departed tyranny
of Globalism or Nationalism which be the tyrant?
Yet passions are deceiving someone,
so near 50 years behindhand a hero fell.
"On this day, the day of March
in my opinion´´, is the end of the
United States of America
as the land of the free
and the home of the brave."