In short, official propaganda is not designed to deceive the public (no more than the speeches in an actor’s script are intended to deceive the actor who speaks them). It is designed to be absorbed and repeated, no matter how implausible or preposterous it might be. Actually, it is often most effective when those who are forced to robotically repeat it know that it is utter nonsense, as the humiliation of having to do so cements their allegiance to the ruling classes (this phenomenon being a standard feature of the classic Stockholm Syndrome model, and authoritarian conditioning generally). The current “Russian hacking” hysteria is a perfect example of how this works. No one aside from total morons actually believes this official narrative (the substance of which is beyond ridiculous), not even the stooges selling it to us. This, however, is not a problem, because it isn’t intended to be believed … it is intended to be accepted and repeated, more or less like religious dogma. (It doesn’t matter what actually happened, i.e., whether the “hack” was a hack or a leak, or who the hackers or leakers were, or who they may have been working for, or what whoever’s motives may have been. What matters is that the ruling classes have issued a new official narrative and are demanding that every “normal” American stand up and swear allegiance to it.)
The responses to Mrs Mays Statement yesterday in Parliament with the notable exception of One, Jeremy Corbyn, demonstrated the above thesis perfectly, for a weaker example look at the debate where all of the speakers prefaced their points with **I Believe in Free Markets, similar pledges usually preface comments on Climate Change.Foucault's notion of the Epistime is also something of the sort getting at the same point.
''I would define the episteme retrospectively as the strategic apparatus which permits of separating out from among all the statements which are possible those that will be acceptable within, I won’t say a scientific theory, but a field of scientificity, and which it is possible to say are true or false. The episteme is the ‘apparatus’ which makes possible the separation, not of the true from the false, but of what may from what may not be characterised as scientific.'' Michel Foucault.
Thursday, 15 March 2018
The Skripal Deception. Mrs Mays BlairCon NEO CON CON
Syria Cui Bono, Incitatus (Boris Johnson) Caligula (john Kerry) and the Curious case of the New Consul at the United Nations Security Council (Updated 7th April , Trump ordered attack On Syria)UPDATE FOR CONTEXT: Roger Lewis 7 April 2017 at 12:56 Syria is all about Gas, not poison Sarin Gas but Gas Pipelines. It is also not a...
09 April 2018 10:26 AM Rushing to Judgement Over Syria - some previous experiences On 3rd November last year I published the...
rogerglewis 9:02 am on October 26, 2017 Permalink | Reply | Edit | Follow IMF Head on Climate: “we will be toasted, roast...