Saturday, 31 March 2018

Has the Holocaust replaced Calvary at the Christian festival of Easter?

Has the Holocaust replaced Calvary at the Christian festival of Easter?



Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Psychology Today author Patricia Prijatel thinks the silence of Germans oppressed by the NAZIs is comparable to not talking about the alleged dangers of anthropogenic climate change.

  1. https://youtu.be/-LsttRlIBtQ At Easter Time it is interesting to see this interview in which the other secular Religión of our time also challenges for the Replacing of Calvary by some other Iconic catastrophe

“What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Obama, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.”


http://oestrem.com/thingstwice/2013/09/this-machine/



123



http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.se/2010/06/goebbels-on-27-march-1942-dalton-keeps.html




Fooled Once said...
Thanks for the improved translation of Goebbels's April 29, 1942 diary sentence, which is a challenge to translators. I don't necessarily accept the translation of "ausrotten," but that's a whole separate controversy. Meantime, your translation of "müssen daran glauben" was helpful, along with the rest of the sentence unacceptably telescoped by Lochner.

Your translation seems to omit a "for" after "pay," but the omission doesn't mislead. A typo, I'd say.

The "short shrift" translation of the preceding sentence is wrong, too. It should be "dealt with summarily" or the like.

Your commentary on Dalton's intentions and agenda merely betray your own, contrary biases. You'd gain credibility (and conciseness) to omit such expostulations in the future. Let your material speak for itself.
Roberto Muehlenkamp said...
Thanks for the improved translation of Goebbels's April 29, 1942 diary sentence, which is a challenge to translators. I don't necessarily accept the translation of "ausrotten," but that's a whole separate controversy.

Actually it's no controversy at all. "Ausrotten" people means to exterminate people, period.

Meantime, your translation of "müssen daran glauben" was helpful, along with the rest of the sentence unacceptably telescoped by Lochner.

Funny that you consider Lochner's translation "unacceptable" but seem to have no problem with Mr. "Dalton"'s outrageous mistranslation. After checking behind your handle I'm no longer surprised, however.

Your translation seems to omit a "for" after "pay," but the omission doesn't mislead. A typo, I'd say.

Yeah, there should be a "for" after the "pay". I'll edit it accordingly and credit you for the correction.

The "short shrift" translation of the preceding sentence is wrong, too. It should be "dealt with summarily" or the like.

"Short shrift" is OK, in my opinion.

Your commentary on Dalton's intentions and agenda merely betray your own, contrary biases.

Nonsense. One doesn't need biases to recognize and expose a biased propagandist's agenda.

You'd gain credibility (and conciseness) to omit such expostulations in the future. Let your material speak for itself.

Considering who this advice comes from, I'm not inclined to take it seriously, for the author of this advice has no more credibility in my eyes than Mr. "Dalton".






torment thee, and still thou livedst but as a

breakfast to the wolf: if thou wert the wolf, thy

greediness would afflict thee, and oft thou shouldst

hazard thy life for thy dinner: wert thou the

unicorn, pride and wrath would confound thee and

make thine own self the conquest of thy fury: wert

thou a bear, thou wouldst be killed by the horse:

wert thou a horse, thou wouldst be seized by the

leopard: wert thou a leopard, thou wert german to

the lion and the spots of thy kindred were jurors on

thy life: all thy safety were remotion and thy

defence absence. What beast couldst thou be, that

were not subject to a beast? and what a beast art

thou already, that seest not thy loss in

transformation!” 

― William Shakespeare, Timon of Athens


http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/04/timonism-calvanist-strain-in-neo.html


"Environmentalism should belong in the social sciences"

along with other "isms" such as communism, feminism, and liberalism.

Klaus said that "environmentalism is a religion" and, answering

questions of U.S. Congressmen, a "modern counterpart of communism"

that seeks to change peoples' habits and economic systems.

Blue Planet in Green Shackles, Vaclav Klaus


http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/03/globalisation-un-entangled-found-poem.html


Climate Change, political Change bedfellows both

the world's biggest polluter, backs the Protocol

is it because they want control of emissions quotas

The imperialist philosophy behind Kyoto?



Not one of the claims contained in the Kyoto Protocol

this "scientific" theory on which they are based

have been confirmed by real facts. Extreme natural

occurrences are not becoming more frequent,

and there has been no increase in infectious diseases.

Unless one sees Globalist imperialism as infectious.


http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/05/terrorism-rape-politics-and-religion.html

The Vision of Christ that thou dost see

Is my Visions Greatest Enemy

Thine has a great hook nose like thine

Mine has a snub nose like to mine5Thine is the Friend of All Mankind

Mine speaks in parables to the Blind

Thine loves the same world that mine hates

Thy Heaven doors are my Hell Gates

Socrates taught what Melitus10Loathd as a Nations bitterest Curse

And Caiphas was in his own Mind

A benefactor of Mankind

Both read the Bible day & night

But thou readst black where I read white


If you think about it Climate Change is part of the Holy Trinity of Globalisation, The others are The The Chosenness of the Elites and the Third the Holocaust as Totem of a Manichean personification of Evil.


123


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iene_nipRXM


The Strength of will supporting the discredited Anthropogenic Global Warming Hypothesis can only be explained in a wider Geo-Political Context outside of the Field of Climatology and Atmospheric physics and Atmospheric and ocean chemistry. 




http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/05/olof-palme-why-i-am-democratic.html


Martin Shubrick says this about the Levers of government.


''The monetary and financial system of an economy are part of the socio-politico-economic control mechanism used by every state to connect the economy with the polity and society. This neural network provides the administrative means to collect taxes, direct investment, provide public goods, trade. The money measures provide a crude but serviceable basis for the accounting system which in turn, along with the codification of commercial law and financial regulation are the basis for economic evaluation and the measurement of trust and fiduciary responsibility among the economic agents. A central feature of a control mechanism is that it is designed to influence process. Dynamics is its natural domain. Equilibrium is not the prime concern, the ability to control the direction of motion is what counts.


Money and financial institutions provide the command and control system of a modern society. The study of the mechanism, how they are formed, how they are controlled and manipulated and how their influence is measured in terms of social, political, and economic purpose pose questions not in pure economics, not even in a narrow political economy, but in the broad compass of a political economy set in the context of society. ''

Martin Shubik.


Now think that through. ( Happy Easter and God Bless )

http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/05/olof-palme-why-i-am-democratic.html

Lorenzetti’s The Effects of Bad Government fresco has not been written on as extensively as The Effects of Good Government, partly due to the worse condition of this fresco. The wall on which the fresco of The Effects of Bad Government is depicted used to be an exterior wall, so has suffered much moisture damage in the past. When the viewer turns to examine this mural, they are confronted with a devious looking figure adorned with horns and fangs, and appearing to be cross-eyed. This figure is identified as TYRAMMIDES (Tyranny). He sits enthroned, resting his feet upon a goat (symbolic of luxury), and in his hand he sinisterly holds a dagger.

Allegory of Bad Government
Below the tyrant the captive figure of Justice lies bound, while the figures of Cruelty, Deceit, Fraud, Fury, Division, and War flank him, and above him float the figures of Avarice, Pride, and Vainglory. These figures, according to an advice book for city magistrates of the time, were considered to be the “leading enemies of human life”.[15]The planets of Jupiter, Saturn, and Mars preside over this scene, as they were the less favorable planets; also included are tyrannical figures such as the Roman Emperor Nero. When we look at the scene of the city itself, it appears to be very jarring; nothing fits as it should be. This is in part to the fact that Lorenzetti presented the scene in such a manner that the viewer must read it right to left, automatically creating a sense of discomfort. When we look at the scene, we see that the city is in ruin, windows are wide open, houses are being demolished, and businesses are nonexistent, except that of the armourer. The streets are deserted, and the country side shows two armies advancing towards each other. The whole scene shows the mirror opposite of that of The Effects of Good Government, creating a powerful reminder to the council.

http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/10/anti-semitic-blogger-who-called.html

http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/06/the-winston-smiths-of-face-book-memory.html




Roger Glyndwr LewisTweet text


http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.se/2013/08/open-letter-to-nick-kollerstrom-on.html

Open Letter to Nick Kollerstrom on the Auschwitz Death Books

Author: Hans Metzner
Dear Nick,

We (that is me) are glad to hear that you have expressed your commitment for free speech and against "arresting people for their beliefs”, and trust that this is not limited to your own beliefs but meant universally, also applying to, say for example, denial of crimes committed against Germans.

We entirely support the concern that spreading historical claims should not be punished in an open society – and would like to add – also when these are utterly absurd, offensive to members of the society and mainly a vehicle of political extremism (such as Holocaust denial).


But let’s switch gears and address your remarks on the Auschwitz death books expressed in that letter to Vladimir Putin.

  1. The Auschwitz death books are incomplete and no record exists for 1944 and 1945. Your statement that the Soviets “seized all of its ‘death books’ with the records of all persons who had died there” is misleading/incorrect.
  2. It can be shown by documentary evidence (corroborated by numerous testimonial evidence) that causes of death in the certificates have been falsified by the SS, namely that unnatural deaths have been camouflaged as natural one's. But then any cause of natural death given in these records (at least since 1942) is a priori doubtful and requires external corroboration to be taken for granted.

    Hence, your statement that the death record “does not record them [the Jews] as having been murdered” is not questioning, let aside rebutting that any Jews have been murdered in Auschwitz.
     
  3. The unrealistic decline of Jewish deaths in 1943 compared to the non-Jewish indicates that most of the former were not entered into the records anymore after February 1943 and that the death records for this year have to be considered unreliable with respect to the number of deaths among registered Jewish prisoners, and you are well aware of this argument.
  4. Jewish people killed directly after their arrival without prior registration in the camp books were not entered into the death records. This can be shown again by documentary evidence.

    On 21 and 24 January 1943, 3.383 Jews considered unfit for work were “specially lodged” in Auschwitz. The term was a variant of “special treatment” (see telex from Heinrich Schwarz to SS-WVHA of 5 March 1943), which in turn was an euphemism at the concentration camp administrations for unnatural deaths without judicial decision.

    However, the death books contain only 2.841 Jewish deaths for the entire months January 1943. Therefore, it is clear that Jews selected as unfit for work at the ramp and killed after their arrival without registration in the camp books were not registered in the death books either, even when this was still practiced for the deaths among registered Jews.

In summary, the death books do not allow any conclusion on the total number of Jews ceased in Auschwitz concentration camp complex nor that Jews were not murdered there.
nicholas said...
Putin Letter

Please forgive my delay in replying.
You start by averring that Revisionism (which you call Holocaust denial) is ‘a vehicle of political extremism.’ Au contraire, as my new book makes crystal-clear www.BreakingTheSpell.co.uk Revisionism is a quest for historical exactitude, and is not politically motivated. It may have political consequences but that is a secondary affair. It is the quest for historical truth which is the sacred thing: on which our future well-being may depend.

1. Yes the Death-books, seized by the Soviets when they liberated Auschwitz and finally published in the 1990s, are incomplete. The Soviets did presumably seize all of these books that they could find. If you want a more careful phrasing of this matter, see my book Breaking the spell The Holocaust Myth and Reality, p.81-84 Let’s agree that some proportion of inmates were not registered, and possibly they died without having death-records. I used the figure of 10% as given by the British intelligence decrypts although I appreciate you might wish to have a far higher figure.(See October 1942 decrypt, http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/hw16_65_zip_os3_29.10.42.html :‘about 2,000 men in the total are always unaccounted for’)

2. You say that cause-of-death reports have been falsified. I’m merely saying that both the Arolsen Archives and the Death Books of Au show a lot of trouble to report the causes of death, at great length, and not one single one anywhere has death by gassing or by cyanide – just as nobody in any German labour-camp reported seeing a bright shocking pink body, which is what results from death by cyanide. I have simply stated a fact, that these death records do not report the murder of any ethnic group eg Jews: which is correct. Inmates were shot at Auschwitz, if they tried to escape. The decrypts make that clear.

3. concerning the (mysterious) decline in reported Jewish deaths in 1943 (see here http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/Death_Certs_IMH_Auschwitz_Charts.html) you aver that this ‘indicates’ that most Jewish deaths were not being recorded. That is mere conjecture on your part, which I try to avoid. You CANNOT SHOW any authentic Nazi document suggesting that such selective non-reporting was taking place.

4. No it cannot be shown! I challenge you to do this. Its just an unverifiable phantasm, that hordes of Jews were gassed-on-arrival without being registered.

Concerning your next paragraph, many Jews unfit for work were lodged at Birkenau camp rather that Auschwitz. Your hunch that ‘specially lodged’ was a code for extermination is again a mere pipedream: that is not the way to do history. The ‘Special treatment’ here alluded to the preocedure, instigated in the summer of 1942 whereby all new arrivals were shaved, had their clothing removed and deloused, and showered, and it worked: slowly the dreadful mortality from the typhus epidemics were brought under control.

Your last paragraph assumes what you are trying to prove, that because ‘only’ 2841 Jewish deaths were reported, that ‘therefore’ jews selected as unfit for work were being exterminated. I believe You cannot produce any Nazi document to support this.

reblogged this interesting discussion. When I was about 8 years Old I lived in Hanover Then West Germany 1969-1975 I was born in 1964. Father was attached to the BAOR. We visited Belsen and it had a profound effect on me and still does to this day.

I remember the Photographs and the Mounds of mass graves I also recall very keenly the News reports of the Soweto Riots in the late 1970's by now we lived in Rural Oxfordshire near Upper Heyford the USAF strategic bombing base and lived near Barford St John Listening Station part of The Echelon Network Father also worked on the defence estate establishment site of Bletchley Park. I remember Protest Graffiti about Vietnam along the Oxford Rs just past Upper Heyford.

It seemed to me then and now that the lessons I thought Belsen must have taught us about war had not been learned.

Quiggleys words.p.232 tragedy and Hope.

´´but criticism should have been directed rather at the hypocrisy and lack

of realism in the ideals of the wartime propaganda and at the lack of honesty of the chief negotiators in carrying on the pretense that these ideals were still in effect while they violated them daily, and necessarily violated them. The settlements were clearly made by secret negotiations, by the Great Powers exclusively, and by power politics. They had to be. No settlements could ever have been made on any other bases. The failure of the chief negotiators (at least the Anglo-Americans) to admit this is regrettable, but behind their

reluctance to admit it is the even more regrettable fact that the lack of political experience and political education of the American and English electorates made it dangerous for the negotiators to admit the facts of life in international political relationships.”

http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2018/04/holocaust-controversies-open-letter-to.html

Henry Kissinger, A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812-1822 (1957)


http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/02/jon-ronson-staring-at-goats-and-alex.html

Leave a Reply - if your comment doesn't appear right away, it may have been intercepted by the SPAM filter. Please have patience while our moderation team examines it.


“What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Obama, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.”

http://oestrem.com/thingstwice/2013/09/this-machine/

torment thee, and still thou livedst but as a
breakfast to the wolf: if thou wert the wolf, thy
greediness would afflict thee, and oft thou shouldst
hazard thy life for thy dinner: wert thou the
unicorn, pride and wrath would confound thee and
make thine own self the conquest of thy fury: wert
thou a bear, thou wouldst be killed by the horse:
wert thou a horse, thou wo
uldst be seized by the
leopard: wert thou a leopard, thou wert german to
the lion and the spots of thy kindred were jurors on
thy life: all thy safety were remotion and thy
defence absence. What beast couldst thou be, that
were not subject to a beast? and what a beast art
thou already, that seest not thy loss in
transformation!”
― William Shakespeare, Timon of Athens

http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/04/timonism-calvanist-strain-in-neo.html

"Environmentalism should belong in the social sciences"
along with other "isms" such as communism, feminism, and liberalism.
Klaus said that "environmentalism is a religion" and, answering
questions of U.S. Congressmen, a "modern counterpart of communism"
that seeks to change peoples' habits and economic systems.
Blue Planet in Green Shackles, Vaclav Klaus

http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/03/globalisation-un-entangled-found-poem.html

Climate Change, political Change bedfellows both
the world's biggest polluter,
backs the Protocol
is it because they want control of emissions quotas
The imperialist philosophy behind Kyoto?


Not one of the claims contained in the Kyoto Protocol
this "scientific" theory on which they are based
have been confirmed by real facts. Extreme natural
occurrences are not becoming more frequent,
and there has been no increase in infectious diseases.
Unless one sees Globalist imperialism as infectious.

http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/05/terrorism-rape-politics-and-religion.html
The Vision of Christ that thou dost see
Is my Visions Greatest Enemy
Thine has a great hook nose like thine
Mine has a snub nose like to mine5Thine is the Friend of All Mankind
Mine speaks in parables to the Blind
Thine loves the same world that mine hates
Thy Heaven doors are my Hell Gates
Socrates taught what Melitus10Loathd as a Nations bitterest Curse
And Caiphas was in his own Mind
A benefactor of Mankind
Both read the Bible day & night
But thou readst black where I read whi
te

If you think about it Climate Change is part of the Holy Trinity of Globalisation, The others are The The Chosenness of the Elites and the Third the Holocaust as Totem of a Manichean personification of Evil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iene_nipRXM

The Strength of will supporting the discredited Anthropogenic Global Warming Hypothesis can only be explained in a wider Geo-Political Context outside of the Field of Climatology and Atmospheric physics and Atmospheric and ocean chemistry.



http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/05/olof-palme-why-i-am-democratic.html

Martin Shubrick says this about the Levers of government.

''The monetary and financial system of an economy are part of the socio-politico-economic control mechanism used by every state to connect the economy with the polity and society. This neural network provides the administrative means to collect taxes, direct investment, provide public goods, trade. The money measures provide a crude but serviceable basis for the accounting system which in turn, along with the codification of commercial law and financial regulation are the basis for economic evaluation and the measurement of trust and fiduciary responsibility among the economic agents. A central feature of a control mechanism is that it is designed to influence process. Dynamics is its natural domain. Equilibrium is not the prime concern, the ability to control the direction of motion is what counts.

Money and financial institutions provide the command and control system of a modern society. The study of the mechanism, how they are formed, how they are controlled and manipulated and how their influence is measured in terms of social, political, and economic purpose pose questions not in pure economics, not even in a narrow political economy, but in the broad compass of a political economy set in the context of society. ''
Martin Shubik.

Now think that through. ( Happy Easter and God Bless )